“An Iranian woman convicted of
murder -- in a killing that human rights groups called self-defense against a
rapist -- was hanged Saturday” (Sanchez, 2014). How is it that a single woman’s story
became so well known throughout the world and a heated topic especially amongst
US news sources? Because this case and the final sentence have generated
discussions about gender inequalities that women around the world can relate
to. The death of Reyhaneh Jabbari signifies the ultimate price a woman can pay
for gender inequalities and it has gotten people talking.
According to Islamic law, which is the
law that governs the theocratic country of Iran, rape can only be proven if the
rapist confesses or if there are four male witnesses (Religion of Peace). The
Qur’an also establishes that a woman’s testimony is worth half that of a man’s
in court as to avoid any “he said/she said” gridlocks (Religion of
Peace). It is due to laws like these that women are given such little power in
regards to something so personal as their sexuality. Women are given very
little power in a court of law generally speaking. But the law goes on to give
men more power in regards to the sexuality of women by being able to decide for
them what constitutes something as serious as rape. This case in particular
demonstrates one of Kim’s heterosexual scripts in which men are given the power
to decide how women will be judged in regards to their sexual conduct (Kim,
2007). It is just one example of many
cases in which heterosexual couples behave in ways that sustain power
inequalities (Kim, 2007). Although we have not discussed religion or race
extensively in this class, this case exemplifies some of the dichotomies we
have examined between men and women. This reinforcement of gender inequalities
is arguably something that transcends national boundaries, cultures and
religions.
Sexual assault and gender inequalities
are topics that hit close to home all around the world and even specifically on
University of Michigan’s campus. Not too long ago, a Michigan Daily article was
published discussing the “It’s On Us” campaign to address the problem of sexual
assault on college campuses. The author, who is a female sexual assault
survivor, addresses what she feels to be a problematic distribution of power
amongst men and women on this campus specifically in regards to how Michigan’s
central student government is responding to the issue of sexual assault on
campus. She expressed her disdain for this power dichotomy when she says that
the It’s On Us campaign at UofM has meant, “A small group of elite white men
with no clue what sexual assault is…have tasked themselves with single handedly
stopping rape on campus from happening” (Palle, 2014). It is evident that women
across the globe feel as though they are being cheated out of their right and
power to speak out in regards to their own sexuality. Rape and assault, both
very personal subjects, are being discussed in a seemingly one-sided manner
that favors the voice of men and not women and this power distribution is
problematic.
Reference
"Islam: What Must a Woman Do to Prove Rape?" TheReligionofPeace - Islam: What Must a Woman Do to Prove Rape? N.p., n.d. Web. 27 Oct. 2014.
Kim, J. L., Sorsoli, C. L., Collins, K.,
Zylbergold, B. A., Schooler, D., & Tolman, D. L. (2007). From sex to
sexuality: Exposing heterosexual script on primetime network television.
Journal of Sex Research, 44 (2), 145-157.
Palle, S. (2014, October 8). Viewpoint:
Horrible leadership at the Univresity, starring Dishell and Schlissel – A
hilariously painful tragicomedy in four parts. The Michigan Daily.
Sanchez, R. (2014, October 25). Iran
executes woman who killed her alleged rapist. CNN World.
This blog post was very interesting and I appreciate that you spoke on a subject not directly discussed in class.
ReplyDeleteWhile reading your post I was reminded of the discussions we have had in regards to labeling and double standards. Although I agree that Kim's heterosexual scripts can be applied to this situation, I think that an outside source better reveals the nature of men labeling women based on attributes such as her sexuality. Schur (1984) states that "The devaluation of women through various deviance labels applied by a male-dominated culture rests less in the blameworthiness or social harm of female behavior..." than in males desire to control and oppress women.
I believe that the extreme example that you discuss can bring to light the harmful labeling that exists in our own country. For instance, labels such as "slut", "whore", and "cunt" oppress women's sexuality by creating negative connotations that taint their sexual practices and reduce their sexual freedom. I think that though these labels do not typically result in the death of females I do believe that they metaphorically kill women's sexual expression. I therefore believe that it is important that we not only strive for equal legal rights but also for equal sexual freedom.
Thanks for the thought provoking post!
Reference: Schur, E. M. (1984). Labeling women deviant: Gender, stigma, and social control. New York: McGraw-Hill.